Re: [xep-support] block-container w/in basic-link doesn't result in working link

From: W. Eliot Kimber (eliot@isogen.com)
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 10:07:04 PST

Next message: W. Eliot Kimber: "[xep-support] Strange Behavior For Start-Before with fo:list"
Previous message: David Tolpin: "Re: [xep-support] block-container w/in basic-link doesn't result"
In reply to: W. Eliot Kimber: "Re: [xep-support] block-container w/in basic-link doesn't result in working link"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

W. Eliot Kimber wrote:

> separate construct at all is a good one: I see no reason why the link
> properties can be allowed everywhere. David's argument that existence of

c/can/cannot/

Cheers,

-- 
W. Eliot Kimber, eliot@isogen.com
Consultant, ISOGEN International
1016 La Posada Dr., Suite 240
Austin, TX  78752 Phone: 512.656.4139
-------------------
By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/tos.html

Next message: W. Eliot Kimber: "[xep-support] Strange Behavior For Start-Before with fo:list"
Previous message: David Tolpin: "Re: [xep-support] block-container w/in basic-link doesn't result"
In reply to: W. Eliot Kimber: "Re: [xep-support] block-container w/in basic-link doesn't result in working link"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 18 2002 - 08:41:28 PST