[xep-support] Re: folio-suffix content model?

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jan 14 2011 - 04:28:10 PST

On 14 January 2011 12:26, Michael Sulyaev <msulyaev@renderx.com> wrote:

> The is a special note in XSL 1.1 spec for this case:
> "An fo:folio-suffix is not permitted to have an fo:page-number,
> fo:page-number-citation, or fo:page-number-citation-last as a descendant."
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#fo_folio-suffix

> The fact that you could fool the validator by wrapping
> fo:page-number-citation-last in an fo:inline inside an fo:folio-suffix --
> that is a bug. However, we won't fix it at the place where it is, because
> the whole stylesheet that performs folio-* resolution we be re-factored into
> Java code for performance.
> Anyway, I'll pay attention to these possible loops and their detection.
> Thanks for reporting!

Yes, I'd missed the note.

Thanks Micheal.


Dave Pawson
Docbook FAQ.
(*) To unsubscribe, please visit http://lists.renderx.com/mailman/options/xep-support
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://w
Received on Fri Jan 14 04:28:17 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 14 2011 - 04:28:18 PST