RE: [xep-support] replacing tables with fo:block - fo:inline

Volodymyr Mykhailyk wrote:
> Hi,
> Actually I am not sure you will be able to do such work-around. It
> will take too much time, and can give no results.
> I think it better to increase memory size used by xep.

I agree that tables are really your only choice here. The only other thing
that might possibly work would be to use side floats for the stuff on the
edges.

You didn't say if each of your examples is coded as a single table or as one
giant table. If the latter then make each one a separate table: that should
produce a much lower memory load than one giant table (assuming that XEP can
free up a table's memory once it's been placed on a page).

A have 100,000 individual tables. I really expected that memory consumption
would be low since the individual tables are small.

Or break your job up into chunks that you can then concatenate together
after XEP processes them. Of course this will only work if you don't need to
do page number citations across chunk boundaries.

This is hardly an option.

Thanks,

jeroen

Cheers,

Eliot

--
W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
9390 Research Blvd, #410
Austin, TX 78759
(214) 954-5198
ekimber@innodata-isogen.com
www.innodata-isogen.com
-------------------
(*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address you are
subscribed from.
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service
http://www.renderx.com/terms-of-service.html
-------------------
(*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address
you are subscribed from.
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/terms-of-service.html