Re: [xep-support] Performance and synchronization: debugging XEP version?

From: Irv Salisbury III <irv@dotech.com>
Date: Fri Apr 22 2005 - 14:22:26 PDT

I am using the xep.jar from the kit. However, I have replaced the
logger with my own logger. Would it still suffer from this? If so, how
do I get my hands on the "production jar"?

Irv

David Tolpin wrote:

>
> On 22.04.2005, at 23:23, Irv Salisbury III wrote:
>
>> I am not using En Masse. I am using straight up XEP. It definitely
>> is in the XEP code. (As can be expected from your previous emails)
>> I wrote a load balancer specific to our app and it now scales
>> linearly. (With XEP in only one thread per VM)
>>
>> Try testing with straight up XEP and you will see the contention. On
>> solaris, you can actually use a status tool to see the contention.
>>
>
> Irv,
>
> the Integration and Connectivity Kit includes a version of xep.jar
> with debugging information turned on. A part of the debugger is a
> static logger which synchronized methods. Are you using by any chance
> the jar from the Kit?
>
> The production jar is the same in all the functionality except that it
> does not print full stack traces and does not have that static
> synchronized logger which is the only possible cause for contention you
> are mentioning.
>
> David
>
> -------------------
> (*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
> in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address
> you are subscribed from.
> (*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of
> Service http://www.renderx.com/tos.html

-------------------
(*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address
you are subscribed from.
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/tos.html
Received on Fri Apr 22 15:02:19 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 22 2005 - 15:02:19 PDT