Re: [xep-support] My graphic is scalled botton up, i need it scalled top-down

From: Alexander Peshkov (peshkov@renderx.com)
Date: Fri May 21 2004 - 06:17:45 PDT

  • Next message: Krishnan, Navaneetha: "RE: [xep-support] XEP Genarating pdfs take long time with .Net interface."

    Hello Marc,

    I'm not quite sure that I understood you correctly, but probably
      content-width="175mm"
      content-height="245mm"
    (no width/height) is what you are looking for. In this case viewport
    will be exactly the same size as scaled picture and you will have no
    extra white-space.

    Best regards,
    Alexander Peshkov mailto:peshkov@renderx.com
    RenderX

    MOT> Hello,

    MOT> this is my problem, i have to embed images of diffrent size in to my pdf so
    MOT> i use this code:

    MOT> content-width="scale-to-fit"
    MOT> content-height="scale-to-fit"
    MOT> width="175mm"
    MOT> height="245mm"

    MOT> if the size of the picture is bigger than 175x245mm ther is no problem. But
    MOT> when the picture is smaller itīs scalled to a bigger picture, so far so
    MOT> good, but it is scalled bottom-up. When the picture is wider then its hight,
    MOT> then there is a lot of white-space above the picture, that looks terible. Is
    MOT> there a possibility to scale top-down? Any ideas would be perfekt.

    MOT> Thankfully Marc

    MOT> -------------------
    MOT> (*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
    MOT> in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address
    MOT> you are subscribed from.
    MOT> (*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/tos.html

    -------------------
    (*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
    in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address
    you are subscribed from.
    (*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/tos.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 21 2004 - 06:30:01 PDT