Re: [xep-support] Forcing an "empty" block to render

From: W. Eliot Kimber (eliot@isogen.com)
Date: Thu Nov 14 2002 - 07:05:33 PST


David Tolpin wrote:
>>>Another natural candidate is <fo:leader/>.
>>
>>I know I can do it with a leader, but it bugs me to have to use a leader
>>when an empty block with a border will get the same effect with less markup.
>
>
> fo:leader INSIDE the empty block.

Right--which is my (admitedly small) complaint: why make me do:

<fo:block
    border-width="1pt"
    border-style="solid"
><fo:leader/></fo:block>

When I could do this:

<fo:block
    border-width="1pt"
    border-style="solid"
/>

Especially when I don't see anything in the spec that licenses the
suppression of blocks that have specified a visual effect.

It's a fine point and not worth coming to blows over. And an argument
could probably made that always having something in your blocks is good
practice. But this feels like a "Simon Says" behavior to me.

Cheers,

E.

-- 
W. Eliot Kimber, eliot@isogen.com
Consultant, ISOGEN International
1016 La Posada Dr., Suite 240
Austin, TX  78752 Phone: 512.656.4139
-------------------
(*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address
you are subscribed from.
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/tos.html


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 18 2002 - 08:41:28 PST