From: W. Eliot Kimber (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Nov 09 2002 - 16:56:00 PST
Gustaf Liljegren wrote:
> I hope there will be a Relax NG validator (supporting normal and
> abbreviated syntax) included in XEP one day. Perhaps XEP error reporting
> would come closer to the intentions in the standard (since the standard
> can't be expressed with a DTD) with a fo.rng file? Do I overlook something?
> What about the XSLT processor?
I'm not sure what schema validation would have to do with XEP or any
other FO processor--do you mean validation of the schema document itself
or validation of instances against the schema? In any case, the use or
non-use of a schema for a document instance has nothing to do with its
formatting or its transformation into FO (except to the degree that your
transform depends on the id() function working).
-- W. Eliot Kimber, email@example.com Consultant, ISOGEN International 1016 La Posada Dr., Suite 240 Austin, TX 78752 Phone: 512.656.4139 ------------------- By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/tos.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 18 2002 - 08:41:28 PST