On 14 January 2011 12:26, Michael Sulyaev <msulyaev@renderx.com> wrote:
> The is a special note in XSL 1.1 spec for this case:
> "An fo:folio-suffix is not permitted to have an fo:page-number,
> fo:page-number-citation, or fo:page-number-citation-last as a descendant."
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#fo_folio-suffix
> The fact that you could fool the validator by wrapping
> fo:page-number-citation-last in an fo:inline inside an fo:folio-suffix --
> that is a bug. However, we won't fix it at the place where it is, because
> the whole stylesheet that performs folio-* resolution we be re-factored into
> Java code for performance.
>
> Anyway, I'll pay attention to these possible loops and their detection.
> Thanks for reporting!
Yes, I'd missed the note.
Thanks Micheal.
regards
-- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk !DSPAM:87,4d30415c63731742210042! _______________________________________________ (*) To unsubscribe, please visit http://lists.renderx.com/mailman/options/xep-support (*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://w ww.renderx.com/terms-of-service.htmlReceived on Fri Jan 14 04:28:17 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 14 2011 - 04:28:18 PST