At 2006-09-01 11:26 -0500, Kevin Trainor wrote:
>Thanks for your recommendation. I will follow it.
>
>Just for educational purposes, do you agree with my original assumption that
>padding should have given me the result that I wanted? Or, was this an
>improper use for padding in your opinion?
XSL-FO 1.0 section 5.3.2 clearly indicates
start-indent= has precedence in this case (even
if inherited from ancestors). In order to get
padding= to have precedence over start-indent=,
one would have to specify margin= and
margin="0pt" is sufficient to engage padding in this fashion.
I hope this helps.
. . . . . . . . . . . . Ken
-- UBL/XML/XSLT/XSL-FO training: Vårø, Denmark 2006-10-02/06,11-20/24 UBL International 2006 2006-11-13/17 http://www.ublconference.com World-wide corporate, govt. & user group UBL, XSL, & XML training. G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/f/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/f/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal ------------------- (*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support' in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address you are subscribed from. (*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/terms-of-service.htmlReceived on Fri Sep 1 10:14:02 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 10:14:03 PDT