[xep-support] Re: Xep-support Digest, Vol 11, Issue 2

From: David Kelly <david.kelly@pragprog.com>
Date: Wed Aug 03 2011 - 12:37:38 PDT

If it makes a difference, adding a different method for validation in
our system would be a bit of a burden for us -- we'd prefer to see a fix.

Regards,
David

On 8/3/2011 3:00 PM, xep-support-request@renderx.com wrote:
> Typically folks that are truly interested in validation can do it in a separate step and would not implement parsing FO in production. So the steps suggested to use alternate methods to validate are usually great for most folks.

!DSPAM:87,4e39a38563731540789092!

_______________________________________________
(*) To unsubscribe, please visit http://lists.renderx.com/mailman/options/xep-support
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://w
ww.renderx.com/terms-of-service.html
Received on Wed Aug 3 12:37:50 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 03 2011 - 12:37:59 PDT