From: MAISONNY Benoit (Benoit.MAISONNY@eurocontrol.int)
Date: Wed Mar 24 2004 - 04:20:24 PST
We compared the AT files produced from the same FO file using different versions of XEP, and found differences in the positioning and width of elements. For example:
xep363: <xep:text value="Copyright " x="332218" y="46987" width="36456"/>
xep372: <xep:text value="Copyright " x="332386" y="46989" width="36440"/>
In some cases, the differences in "y" value can amount to 10000. The difference in width is probably the cause of the positioning differences. Perhaps you changed the algorithm to compute the characters' size?
Of course, we are using the same fonts.xml file, on the same computer, to compare results.
Is there a way to avoid these differences? We need to find which pages have changed between 2 versions of a document, and we are using the AT format to spot any difference. But in this case, the differences on the page are due to XEP, not to any change in content.
Benoit MAISONNY email@example.com
eAIP development & support http://www.eurocontrol.int/ais/eaip
EUROCONTROL Aeronautical Information Management
This message and any files transmitted with it are legally privileged and intended for the sole use of the individual(s) or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Any unauthorised use or disclosure of the content of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Nothing in this e-mail message amounts to a contractual or legal commitment on the part of EUROCONTROL unless it is confirmed by appropriately signed hard copy.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the sender.
(*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
in the body of the message to firstname.lastname@example.org from the address
you are subscribed from.
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/tos.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 24 2004 - 04:38:53 PST