From: Ken Brooks (kbrooks@pubdimensions.com)
Date: Sun Jan 05 2003 - 16:29:26 PST
Nikolai,
Your answer was a reasonable guess based on the information I supplied.
I didn't mention that the problem appears intermittent - the same
numerals appear correctly in most instances, but not in all.
As you suggest, I'm sending the files directly into you at
support@renderx.com.
Thank you for looking into it.
Best regards,
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xep-support@www.renderx.com
[mailto:owner-xep-support@www.renderx.com] On Behalf Of Nikolai
Grigoriev
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:27 PM
To: xep-support@renderx.com
Cc: Ken Brooks
Subject: Re: [xep-support] Type 1 versus OpenType font behavior
Type 1 versus OpenType font behaviorHi Ken,
> I used OpenType fonts for the one that went through
> the PDF output processor and the same Type 1 fonts
> through the Postscript route. The documents looked
> largely the same with one puzzling exception: in the
> running header the page number would frequently have
> one of the digits misaligned with the other (looking like
> a full-sized superscript). The same thing was happening
> with figure numbers in image captions.
It is virtually impossible that XEP itself displaces individual
characters vertically - it puts them as a string of text, not
as single glyphs. I'd rather suspect the problem is in the font.
Most probably, your PostScript font uses old-style digits.
(My paper copy of Webster has pages numbered with these;
perhaps you can find a similar example in some other
dictionary or encyclopaedia). Try to format the following
FO piece with your font:
<fo:inline text-decoration="underline">01234567890</fo:inline>
If I guessed right, than you should see the following:
- 0, 1, and 2 are small in size (like a small character - x-height
tall);
- 6 and 8 are bigger, and rise above the x-height;
- 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9 are the same size as 6 and 8 but descend below the
baseline.
If so, you probably have to ask your font supplier for another
copy of the font. Strictly speaking, such a situation is not normal:
old-style digits should have different names in PostScript
('oneoldstyle', 'twooldstyle', etc. compared to 'one', 'two'
etc. for regular digits). You may ask the foundry why did
they code old-style glyphs with regular-style names.
Naturally, mine is only a guess. If I missed the point,
please send your font files with a problematic FO
sample to support@renderx.com, so that we can investigate
the problem further.
Best regards,
Nikolai Grigoriev
RenderX
-------------------
(*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address
you are subscribed from.
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service
http://www.renderx.com/tos.html
-------------------
(*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address
you are subscribed from.
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/tos.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 16:26:53 PST